In the world of football, the age of a coach is often the subject of heated debate. The famous Ukrainian coach Vyacheslav Grozny expressed his opinion on this matter, pointing out the groundlessness of speculations revolving around the age aspect of coaching.

From experience to youth: coaching balance

Grozny claims that age is not a decisive factor for success on the coaching bridge. "Age is not what determines the competence of a coach," he says. An example of the unchanging relevance of experience is Mircea Lucescu, who even at the age of 78 remains in the coaching elite. On the other hand, young talents like Julian Nagelsmann manage national teams and clubs despite age stereotypes.

Myths and reality of the coaching profession

**"Coaching talent does not depend on passport data," says Grozny. He criticizes those who try to tie the success of coaches to their age or nationality, instead of focusing on the real abilities and effectiveness of their work. Grozny also speaks out against the artificial hype that often arises around foreign coaches, recalling the successes of Valery Lobanovskyi and other domestic specialists.

Experience vs. Hype: Coaching Choices

"Experience is the key to understanding the game," says Vyacheslav Grozny, emphasizing the importance of gaining professional experience for coaches. He believes that young coaches need time to understand all the subtleties of football tactics and strategy. Grozny states that his own approach to coaching is based on seriousness and dedication to football, rather than following fashion trends.

Back to business: when Grozny starts training

"Training is what I love," Grozny admits, explaining why he did not choose the path of a sports director. Currently, he actively lectures and communicates with colleagues, but does not rule out a return to coaching in the future. His passion for football and desire to develop players leave the door open for future coaching projects.

Editor: Vitalina Patskan